wimbledon surface If Nadal's rival was Sampras, and not Federer, would he have the same success?

wimbledon surface: If Nadal’s opposition was Sampras, as well as not Federer, would he have a same success?
I suspicion about this subject a utterly a bit as well as we have to wonder, If Nadal’s opposition was Pete Sampras as well as not Roger Federer, would he have been equates to to browbeat Sampras in conduct to conduct matchups a same approach he’s dominated Federer.

Sampras was a shotmaker, as well as a competence upon grass, as most of us know, as well as it would’ve been genuine engaging to see him in his prime, fool around “present day” Rafa, upon a weed during Wimbledon or any alternative surface, outward of clay

Your thoughts?

Answer by rammsteinfan-1
It’s regularly formidable to contend how guys who never played eachother competence have suited up since there have been so most factors to consider. A lot of it depends upon how both would transport opposite a ubiquitous margin in eachother’s era.
On clay, we disbelief it would have done most of a disproportion as Sampras was frequency a cause during a French. That said, Nadal would have faced a some-more perfectionist horde of clay-specialists. Guys similar to Muster, Corretja, Bruguera, as well as a immature Moya would have acted a larger plea for Nadal in Paris than todays crop. It’s a pointer of a state of clay-court tennis which Federer, by no equates to a mud devil, has been Nadal’s toughest aspirant upon a surface.
Obviously, upon weed Sampras would have been a high sequence though there were additionally distant some-more loyal grass-courters in a 90′s so they might never have had a possibility to encounter in a Wimbledon final. Taking zero divided from today’s field, though Nadal would have had a harder time removing there if he’d had to glance down a likes of Ivanisevic, Krajicek, as well as Becker upon grass. Nonetheless, I’d have to put Pistol Pete as a a one preferred during Wimbledon.
Hard courts have been a toughest to call. Unlike a 90′s, we only do not get genuine surface-specialists these days. Most of today’s competitors have been able upon hard-courts, so Nadal has a broader operation of top-level opponents he’s expected to face in New York or Melbourne. That said, Sampras won 7 majors upon hard-courts, so he’d be a expected a one preferred upon a surface.
However, as Nadal has won only dual of his 6 Majors to date divided from a clay, it is unequivocally as well early in his career to contend how he’d have fared in Sampras’ era.

Add your own answer in a comments!