Friday 15 July 2011

wimbledon surface Why is Rafa Nadal not so good on hardcourt?

wimbledon surface: Why is Rafa Nadal not so great upon hardcourt?
Because clay (slow surface) is his best, he won wimbledon (the quickest). So since is he bad upon hardcourt given the aspect should be closer to to clay upon speed, than grass?

And, is there the possibility which Djokovic competence tumble down in the rankings, he mislaid to Safin early Wimbledon.

Answer by Brandon C
It competence be since of the approach he runs as good as the hardcourt has as good most stroke upon his feet

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Nadal in all plays an assertive behind-the-baseline diversion founded upon complicated topspin groundstrokes, consistency, rapid footwork, as good as devoted justice coverage.[65] Known for his athleticism as good as speed around the court, Nadal is the able defender[66] who hits good upon the run, constructing winning plays from clearly defensive positions. He additionally plays really excellent dropshots, which work generally good since his complicated topspin mostly forces opponents to the behind of the court. [67] Nadal is essentially the baseliner as good as occasionally volleys though when he does come to the net he is the able volleyer. Nadal employs the full horse opera hold forehand, mostly with the “lasso-whip” follow through, where his left arm hits by the round as good as finishes on top of his left shoulder—as against to the some-more normal finish conflicting the physique or around his conflicting shoulder.[68][69] Nadal’s forehand groundstroke form allows him to strike shots with complicated topspin—more so than most of his contemporaries.[70] San Francisco tennis researcher John Yandell used the high-speed video camera as good as special program to equate the normal series of revolutions of the tennis round strike full force by Nadal. The initial guys you did were Sampras as good as Agassi. They were attack forehands which in ubiquitous were spinning about 1800 to 1900 revolutions per minute. Federer is attack with an extraordinary volume of spin, too, right? Twenty-seven hundred revolutions per minute. Well, you totalled a single forehand Nadal strike during 4900. His normal was 3200.” [71] While
Video Rating: 4 / 5

0 comments :