wimbledon history Why was Rafael Nadal not judged to be the winner after the first two sets which he won 6-4, 6-4 ?

wimbledon history: Why was Rafael Nadal not judged to be a leader after a initial dual sets that he won 6-4, 6-4 ?
Rafael Nadal prevailed 6-4, 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-7(8), 9-7,in a longest last in Wimbledon story ( headlines by “The Associated Press”).

Q) Are there opposite manners in a finals?
Q) What have been a reasons for personification a third set, when a player has already won a initial dual sets??
Paddy M, SS103 & Lesh says– many appropriate of 5 sets.
Jyoti says— many appropriate of 3 sets.

give a last unambigious statement.

Answer by Paddy M
because it was a many appropriate of 5 sets.

Give your answer to this subject below!

Federer as well as Nadal conflict out a single of a many epic tiebreaks in Wimbledon history. Two of a biggest flitting shots of a contest happened behind to back. Federer saved dual championship points by attack an genius as well as a purchase backhand down a line.